Written by Kirk Baird
John Carter is now out
on Blu-ray and DVD. The film is best known for
being perhaps the year’s biggest flop, an
honor more dubious perhaps than merited.
I didn’t care for the film on the big screen. But movies in
theaters are bigger than life, which tends to magnify any flaws (like putting a
magnifying glass over someone’s face).
On the new Disney Blu-ray release, though, John Carter wasn’t half-bad. Which is a
polite way of saying it was only half good.
The trouble with John
Carter has a lot to do with redundancy. The film is based on a series of
pulp novels from Edgar Rice Burroughs’ written roughly a century ago. The story
concerns a Civil War vet named John Carter who finds himself teleported to the
dying surface of Mars, where he helps lead the resistance against a war-minded nation.
The book series was popular among the science-fiction crowd,
which means a lot of current directors read them growing up and were, in turn,
influenced by them. Pixar’s Andrew Stanton, who ultimately directed John Carter, being one of them. These
filmmakers also copied from Burroughs’ work – or, at least, borrowed liberally.
That’s a point of praise for Burroughs. It’s also a serious flaw in the John Carter film. We’ve seen so much of
its imaginative settings and sequences before in the Star Wars movies, Stargate,
Avatar, to name a few, that John Carter feels stale and old – even
though the movie was released only in late March. There’s very little wow
factor at play in the two-hour-plus film, which is not what you expect of a movie
budgeted at $250 million.
Perhaps that’s why it grossed less than $75 million of
that domestically. If you account for worldwide revenue, John Carter at least did respectably with nearly $210 million –
which would push the film past the break-even point, in theory.
The film is also hindered by the rather unimpressive
feature-film debut of Taylor Kitsch. Nice kid, good actor in small doses and
certainly on the small screen on Friday Night Lights, which is what he’s known
for. But as the centerpiece to a big-budget effects and action-driven film, he
lacks the requisite charisma. Kitsch is like a pretty vase placed on a football
field: he is swallowed up by the surroundings.
Lynn Collins, who plays his love interest Dejah Thoris, the
princess of Mars, isn’t much better. Lovely actress, but she cannot carry the
role.
And these problems are amplified on the big screen. In the
comfort of a living room, though, these flaws seem less significant; it’s easy
to dismiss the criticism of John Carter
as overblown and another instance of a film snobbery pile-on. And that’s not incorrect.
We critics can harp on a film. And when there’s blood in the water (meaning a
film is dying at the box office), we become even more vicious.
While I believe the collective dismissal of the film was
correct for the theatrical release of John
Carter, on Blu-ray/DVD the new format and smaller screen merits a do-over.
John Carter isn’t
a great film. But it’s not a bad either. And certainly not worthy of the
“box-office bomb to end all bombs” tag it’s been saddled with. It is worth checking out, if only to see what
all the criticism and bad press was about. And then decide if it’s true.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We'd love to hear what you think! Just be sure to leave your name and email address or your username, so we can respond appropriately.